Comments on: How To Easily Hide Client-side Content from Google Web/Mobile Preview Bot http://www.redcardinal.ie/google/08-03-2011/cloak-content-to-google-preview-bot/ Search Engine Optimisation Ireland Sat, 21 Mar 2015 23:42:33 +0100 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.1 By: Simonhttp://www.redcardinal.ie/google/08-03-2011/cloak-content-to-google-preview-bot/#comment-959737 Tue, 21 May 2013 11:56:42 +0000 http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=1165#comment-959737 Thanks for the trick,
it seemed to work right away, and saved me a lot of trouble figuring it out another way.

Thanks :-)

]]>
By: Markhttp://www.redcardinal.ie/google/08-03-2011/cloak-content-to-google-preview-bot/#comment-896315 Wed, 10 Apr 2013 07:54:50 +0000 http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=1165#comment-896315 Thanks for a quick response, Richard. I’ll share this with my production department right away. Have a nice day :)

]]>
By: Richard Hearnehttp://www.redcardinal.ie/google/08-03-2011/cloak-content-to-google-preview-bot/#comment-896259 Wed, 10 Apr 2013 05:29:11 +0000 http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=1165#comment-896259 Yep – still works.

]]>
By: Markhttp://www.redcardinal.ie/google/08-03-2011/cloak-content-to-google-preview-bot/#comment-893923 Sat, 06 Apr 2013 12:28:06 +0000 http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=1165#comment-893923 Been searching for a trick like this. I’ve noticed that this post is a bit old, does it still work?

]]>
By: Jesper Damtofthttp://www.redcardinal.ie/google/08-03-2011/cloak-content-to-google-preview-bot/#comment-264710 Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:16:29 +0000 http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=1165#comment-264710 Thanks for the great trick Richard, will come in handy. :-)

]]>
By: Roryhttp://www.redcardinal.ie/google/08-03-2011/cloak-content-to-google-preview-bot/#comment-110148 Mon, 14 May 2012 17:40:48 +0000 http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=1165#comment-110148 This is the exact code I was looking for! I’ve discovered that when you work in web design you have to run a lot of reports, and making sure that they don’t interfere with Google’s preview results is absolutely key.

]]>
By: Jon Tiffanyhttp://www.redcardinal.ie/google/08-03-2011/cloak-content-to-google-preview-bot/#comment-77149 Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:20:02 +0000 http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=1165#comment-77149 Missing the regular updates, but a great post as always. I’m going to look into the previews on my sites and check they are showing correctly. This is going to be really important for getting the best click through rates.

]]>
By: Sanovnikhttp://www.redcardinal.ie/google/08-03-2011/cloak-content-to-google-preview-bot/#comment-39649 Sun, 03 Jul 2011 20:11:41 +0000 http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=1165#comment-39649 Is it possible to go even further? To use preview as a “teaser”, which says “visit the real page for the good stuff”.
That is worth a few thoughts, I say.

]]>
By: denisehttp://www.redcardinal.ie/google/08-03-2011/cloak-content-to-google-preview-bot/#comment-35861 Thu, 05 May 2011 03:49:27 +0000 http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=1165#comment-35861 where are you at at the moment?

your updates are missed?

just subscribed to see if you have any new links for really really good search engines apart from the usual..

is there any more coming on stream in the future?

kind regards

denise

]]>
By: Jesper Jørgensenhttp://www.redcardinal.ie/google/08-03-2011/cloak-content-to-google-preview-bot/#comment-34550 Tue, 05 Apr 2011 10:10:48 +0000 http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=1165#comment-34550 Hi Richard

We run a lot of surveys for our clients, and we also noticed that the popups show on some of the previews. Your trick is really neat, so I will hurry to start the first implementation :-)

]]>
By: Derekhttp://www.redcardinal.ie/google/08-03-2011/cloak-content-to-google-preview-bot/#comment-32793 Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:16:01 +0000 http://www.redcardinal.ie/?p=1165#comment-32793 Well Richard, long time no hear, the preview is not something i would of even thought of re google previewing a script etc, what about making the preview show what you want?
What do you make of big Gs current so called shake up aimed at content farms and the like, i always assummed that the search algo had some type of content quality weighting, yet it seems that the borderline gibberish that is the world of auto content is effecting the results.

]]>