Comments on: For chuckles (but really shouldn't) http://www.redcardinal.ie/general/01-12-2014/for-chuckles-but-really-shouldnt/ Search Engine Optimisation Ireland Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:03:56 +0100 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.1 By: Al JRhttp://www.redcardinal.ie/general/01-12-2014/for-chuckles-but-really-shouldnt/#comment-1498485 Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:03:47 +0000 http://www.redcardinal.ie/general/01-12-2014/for-chuckles-but-really-shouldnt/#comment-1498485 add in the Fukushima radiation and Russia refusing Nissan containers and it's not far from the truth..

]]> By: Richard Hearnehttp://www.redcardinal.ie/general/01-12-2014/for-chuckles-but-really-shouldnt/#comment-1498096 Tue, 02 Dec 2014 03:32:17 +0000 http://www.redcardinal.ie/general/01-12-2014/for-chuckles-but-really-shouldnt/#comment-1498096 The mist clears.  I was caught by the tweets sounding very British. Fairly daring for a car brand I'd say.

]]> By: John Muellerhttp://www.redcardinal.ie/general/01-12-2014/for-chuckles-but-really-shouldnt/#comment-1497800 Mon, 01 Dec 2014 22:02:50 +0000 http://www.redcardinal.ie/general/01-12-2014/for-chuckles-but-really-shouldnt/#comment-1497800 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlOEaOKX7Zg says yes

]]> By: Edwin Jonkhttp://www.redcardinal.ie/general/01-12-2014/for-chuckles-but-really-shouldnt/#comment-1497651 Mon, 01 Dec 2014 18:40:26 +0000 http://www.redcardinal.ie/general/01-12-2014/for-chuckles-but-really-shouldnt/#comment-1497651 Marketing stunt?

]]>